The Self-Help Lie: Why Superhero Fiction Understands Identity Better
Contemporary literature loves a 'journey of self-discovery.' Mike Chen’s 'We Could Be Heroes' argues that identity isn’t found—it’s built from rubble.
What if the entire modern literary project of “finding yourself” is a lie? Mike Chen’s superhero-amnesiac novel, We Could Be Heroes, argues it is, revealing that identity is less a discovery and more a desperate act of construction in the face of a terrifying void.
Does Genre Fiction Offer Deeper Character Insights?
This article argues that the tropes of genre fiction, particularly in the case of superhero narratives, can provide a more potent and honest exploration of identity than many contemporary literary novels. We'll explore:
- A deep analysis of identity fabrication in Mike Chen's We Could Be Heroes.
- A critique of the popular “uncovering the past” trope as a lazy narrative shortcut to character development.
- How Lydia Hope’s Homebound represents the conventional, yet limited, approach to memory and selfhood.
- Why speculative concepts like amnesia and superpowers are uniquely effective tools for psychological examination.
The Treacherous Myth of the Authentic Self
Our culture is saturated with the gospel of the authentic self. From wellness influencers to the plots of countless novels, we’re fed a single, seductive narrative: deep within you, buried under layers of trauma, expectation, and societal pressure, is a “real” you. The goal of a meaningful life, these stories suggest, is to excavate this pristine identity, dust it off, and present it to the world. It’s a comforting idea, framing our existence as a treasure hunt where the map is our own past and X marks the spot of our essential nature.
Literary fiction, particularly the brand of domestic drama that dominates book club lists, is the high priest of this creed. A character returns to their claustrophobic hometown, unearths a long-buried family secret, and voilà—the revelation becomes the key that unlocks their future. Their identity was simply waiting in a locked attic, a forgotten letter, a hushed confession from a dying relative. This narrative structure is tidy, emotionally resonant, and profoundly dishonest. It reduces human agency to a form of psychic archaeology and suggests that who we are is static, predetermined by events we may not even remember. It’s a passive model of selfhood, one that absolves us of the messy, terrifying work of actually building a self.
Forging Identity in a Void: The Case of We Could Be Heroes

Enter Mike Chen’s We Could Be Heroes, a novel that looks like a lighthearted superhero romp and acts like a surgical scalpel to the heart of the “authentic self” myth. The story centers on two individuals in the fictional city of San Delgado: Jamie, a memory-wiped man who robs banks with his power of mind control just to pay his rent and feel a flicker of purpose, and Zoe, an amnesiac woman who uses her super-speed and strength to stop criminals as the beloved vigilante, The Preserver. Neither has any memory of who they were before waking up with extraordinary abilities a few months prior. They have no past to excavate, no family secrets to uncover. They are blank slates.
This is where Chen’s genius lies. By yanking the rug of backstory out from under his characters, he forces them—and the reader—to confront the terrifying reality of what a self is without memory. It’s not a void waiting to be filled by a rediscovered truth; it’s a canvas that must be actively, and often clumsily, painted. Jamie’s identity as a “villain” is pure performance. He leaves apologetic notes for the bank tellers he mind-controls. His apartment is meticulously organized, a desperate attempt to impose order on his inner chaos. He isn't acting out of a core malevolence; he's reverse-engineering a personality from the single clue he has: his power. He can control minds, so he becomes a thief, because what else is a power like that for? It’s a chillingly logical, yet entirely fabricated, identity.
Zoe’s situation is the mirror image. Her persona as “The Preserver” is a construct built from public expectation and the scraps of news reports about her deeds. She performs the role of the hero because the city needs one, but privately, she is paralyzed by anxiety and loneliness, renting a room from a family whose normalcy she craves like a drug. Her identity is a uniform she puts on, one that becomes heavier with every public appearance. Chen brilliantly shows that for both Jamie and Zoe, identity is not an internal state but an external script. They are defined by what they do, because they have no memory of who they were. Their journey isn’t about finding themselves; it's about deciding if the selves they’ve been forced to invent are ones they can live with. Their connection, when they finally meet in a support group for amnesiacs, is profound precisely because it isn't based on a shared past, but on a shared, terrifying present.
The Confines of Memory: When the Past Is a Prison

To see how radical Chen’s approach is, one need only look at a more conventional narrative like Lydia Hope’s Homebound. The novel executes a familiar premise: a protagonist returns to their childhood home, a place of supposed comfort that is, in reality, a landscape of unresolved tensions and buried secrets. The narrative engine is the slow unearthing of the past. The protagonist's present-day paralysis is explicitly linked to a historical trauma or a family lie that must be exposed. The promise of the book, and so many like it, is that a confrontation with this past will lead to catharsis and, ultimately, freedom. The character will finally understand why they are the way they are, and this understanding will magically pave the road to their future.
This is the literary equivalent of solving a mystery. But people aren't mysteries to be solved; they are projects to be built. In Homebound, identity is treated as a derivative of history. The past is not just a factor; it is the definitive, causal force. The protagonist’s agency is limited to a forensic investigation of their own life. While this can make for a compelling plot, it presents a deeply deterministic view of humanity. It reinforces the idea that we are prisoners of our past, and that the only path to selfhood is through correctly interpreting its clues. This is a far cry from the terrifying, exhilarating freedom given to Chen's characters. Jamie and Zoe are not defined by their forgotten histories. They are burdened by the need to create a future from scratch, a task that is far more daunting and, ultimately, more human.
The comfort of the The Family Novel Scorecard: Ranking Books on Human Connection often lies in this deterministic framework—it assures us that there are answers, that our neuroses have neat origin stories. But Chen’s work suggests a more unsettling truth: sometimes, there are no answers, and the only way forward is to stop digging and start building.
Why Superpowers Are the Ultimate Psychological Tool
It’s tempting to dismiss all this as an unfair comparison. A superhero novel is escapism, right? It deals in fantasy, not the gritty realities of human psychology. This is a tired, snobbish argument that fundamentally misunderstands the power of speculative fiction. By creating a world where the impossible is real, genre authors can isolate and amplify fundamental human truths in ways that strict realism cannot.
Amnesia in We Could Be Heroes is not a cheap plot device; it is a metaphor for the universal experience of feeling disconnected from one's own life, of wondering if the person you perform every day is an imposter. The superpowers are not wish-fulfillment; they are physical manifestations of our innate capacities and the societal roles they force upon us. A person with immense strength is expected to be a protector. A person who can control minds is feared as a manipulator. The powers are a stand-in for any talent, trauma, or trait that threatens to define us from the outside in.
Chen uses this speculative framework to conduct a thought experiment: if you strip away memory, context, and history, what is left of a person? His answer is radical: what’s left is choice. The choice to be the person the world tells you to be, or the choice to define yourself through new actions, new connections, and a newly forged code of ethics. This is a far more active, empowering, and honest model of identity than the passive archaeology offered by so much contemporary fiction. It asserts that we are not the sum of our pasts, but the product of our present-day choices. And that is a truth more powerful than any superpower.
Editor's Verdict
Mike Chen’s We Could Be Heroes is a Trojan horse. It arrives dressed in the bright colors of a superhero story but delivers a sharp, incisive critique of our most cherished narratives about the self. It dismantles the comforting lie that we are waiting to be found and replaces it with the difficult, essential truth that we must be built.
The final confrontation in We Could Be Heroes offers a more nuanced and emotionally honest resolution to a character's identity crisis than any of this year's National Book Award literary fiction finalists. It's a testament to the power of genre to ask the biggest questions we have.
FAQ
Is 'We Could Be Heroes' a standalone novel?
Yes, 'We Could Be Heroes' by Mike Chen is a standalone novel and not part of a series. It tells a complete story with a definitive ending.
What genre is 'We Could Be Heroes'?
It blends superhero fiction with contemporary character drama. The focus is less on epic battles and more on the psychological and emotional impact of having superpowers, especially when coupled with amnesia.
What other books explore themes of memory and identity in a speculative way?
If you enjoyed the themes in 'We Could Be Heroes,' you might also appreciate books like Blake Crouch's 'Recursion,' which explores the nature of memory and reality, or Kazuo Ishiguro's 'The Buried Giant,' which uses a fantasy setting to examine collective and personal amnesia.